Home / Off Camera / Narnia & Culture

Does It Really Matter If Aslan Is a "He"? Here's What I Found After the Camera Stopped

Netflix cast a woman to voice Aslan, and I said it's like letting an elephant in the house. Then I asked myself: it's fiction, so why does it matter? Here's where I landed.

Netflix's Narnia: Why Change Aslan? | A Christian Reaction

Hey! In my last video I reacted to the news about Netflix's new Narnia movie, The Magician's Nephew, directed by Greta Gerwig. In September Netflix confirmed that Meryl Streep will voice Aslan. A lot of Christians are upset, and I gave my two cents: if you let an elephant in the house, don't be surprised when it breaks stuff.

But after I stopped recording, one question kept bugging me. I even asked it out loud in the video: "It's a fictional story, Manny. What's the big deal?" So I went digging.

Why Aslan is a lion in the first place

C.S. Lewis didn't pick a lion by accident. In one of his letters he explained it himself. Narnia is a world of talking animals, so he imagined Christ becoming a talking animal there, the same way He became a man here. And he chose a lion for three reasons:

That "Lion of Judah" line comes straight out of Revelation:

Stop weeping! Look, the Lion of the tribe of Judah, the heir to David's throne, has won the victory.Revelation 5:5 (NLT)

So Aslan isn't just "a nice lion." He's Lewis's picture of Jesus: the Son, the King, the One who dies and comes back. That's why changing him feels different from changing any other character.

What surprised me

I wanted to be fair, so I looked for the other side. And I found something I didn't expect: the Bible does use motherly pictures to describe God.

I will comfort you there in Jerusalem as a mother comforts her child.Isaiah 66:13 (NLT)

Jesus even described Himself like this, looking over Jerusalem:

How often I have wanted to gather your children together as a hen protects her chicks beneath her wings, but you wouldn't let me.Matthew 23:37 (NLT)

So tenderness, comfort and protection aren't "un-God-like." God's love has a gentleness we usually connect with moms. I'll be honest, I didn't have that one in my back pocket.

But here's the difference

Those verses are comparisons: God comforts like a mother, Jesus gathers like a hen. But when God tells us who He is, the names He gives are Father and Son.

Pray like this: Our Father in heaven, may your name be kept holy.Matthew 6:9 (NLT)
So the Word became human and made his home among us... And we have seen his glory, the glory of the Father's one and only Son.John 1:14 (NLT)

Jesus didn't just look male in some story. He actually came as a man, the Son. And Aslan was built to point to Him. So when a movie keeps the lion but changes who he is, it's not just a casting choice. It blurs the picture Lewis was painting on purpose.

My conclusion: Yes, it's fiction. But Narnia is fiction that was designed to point to something real. The Bible does show God's tender, comforting side, and I'm glad I found that. But it reveals Him as Father and Son, and Aslan was Lewis's way of showing the Son. That's why it matters. And the elephant? I think the controversy is part of the marketing. We don't have to take the bait or get angry. We can just know the real story better than the remake.

What I'm doing with this

I probably won't watch it. But I'm not going to spend my week mad about it either. James says it straight:

You must all be quick to listen, slow to speak, and slow to get angry.James 1:19 (NLT)

If you love Narnia, read the books with your kids and talk about who Aslan points to. That does more good than any comment war.

Your turn

Did you know the Bible uses motherly pictures for God? Does that change how you see this Narnia story, or not? Tell me in the comments on the video.

Watch the full reaction

Tell me in the comments where you landed.

Watch on YouTube